You, Mr. Speaker, are more than happy to spend “money we don’t have” as long as it’s on tax cuts for the very wealthy or subsidies for your corporate donors. The only ones you want to pay any sacrifice for your ill begotten notion of “fiscal responsibility” are the poor and disadvantaged.
Just got off the phone with the president while he’s out of the country. My position has not changed. Washington cannot continue to spend money we do not have at the expense of children and grandchildren. Tomorrow, he and I will meet in person to continue negotiations.

May 22, 2023 · 6:50 AM UTC

78
214
13
1,111
Replying to @marwilliamson
Keep kicking the can down the road? That’s the solution?
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Time to drain the swamp!
Replying to @marwilliamson
Cutting taxes isn’t spending money.
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Taxation is theft Marianne. We can't have compassionate spending when the money being used is stolen and not graciously given. They sacrifice care when they exercise force and in some instances, violence to fund programs to provide care. You say you want a Department of Peace but you can't fund a Department of Peace with money that was taken by force under threats of violence. Also, the more debt is increased the more liberty is decreased. I still like you more than any other candidate but be real about what taxation is. You can't be for love and compassion and for forced taxation at the same time.
6
1
1
10
Replying to @marwilliamson
Lady . You're delusional and have no clue what you're talking about. You're parroting lib talking points that are decades old and fraught with the same lies they've been telling.
Replying to @marwilliamson
😂That's not his fault that's your partys fault. People don't like you authoritarian lover
Replying to @marwilliamson
Spend money on tax cuts? That's like quitting your job to save money. Can you even get close to being real, or do you truly operate in lala land?
1