When I was young, Eugene McCarthy and Bobby Kennedy challenged the sitting president, LBJ. No one thought it was weird for them to do so. In 1980, Teddy Kennedy challenged the sitting president, Jimmy Carter. No one thought it was weird for him to do so. People simply thought that was the democratic process. Because it is. The narrative that there's something *wrong* with challenging an incumbent president - as though there's an unwritten rule that it's a bad idea - is ridiculous. It's part of the "but it has to be this way" illusion by which political elites have trained people to limit our political imaginations for decades. People should run who feel moved to run, and everyone should have a chance to hear their ideas. Three people are running for the Democratic nomination in 2024 and three people should be seen together on a debate stage. *That* is the democratic way.

May 5, 2023 · 12:32 PM UTC

545
721
154
4,254
Replying to @marwilliamson
Ummm… so what was the end result of the 1968 & 1980 elections?? Just curious…
3
8
Replying to @marwilliamson
There are many running for president.
Replying to @marwilliamson
You are missing the part where history blames Kennedy weakening Carter for the election of Ronald Reagan but go on....
4
7
112
Replying to @marwilliamson
100% correct!
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
LOL. Both of those presidents lost. Fingers crossed you can help out getting rid of Biden.
3
11
Replying to @marwilliamson
Nothing wrong about challenging a sitting president as long as the challenger has any credibility
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Well, I was of voting age, though he had been murdered by then, I voted for Kennedy in the Colorado caucus. When McCarthy won a large percent of NH, the pushback was intense. And of course, there was no thought of LBJ debating
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
what happened to Jimmy Carter in that election? You understand you just owned yourself right?
4
38
Replying to @marwilliamson
This is the way
1