When I was young, Eugene McCarthy and Bobby Kennedy challenged the sitting president, LBJ. No one thought it was weird for them to do so. In 1980, Teddy Kennedy challenged the sitting president, Jimmy Carter. No one thought it was weird for him to do so. People simply thought that was the democratic process. Because it is. The narrative that there's something *wrong* with challenging an incumbent president - as though there's an unwritten rule that it's a bad idea - is ridiculous. It's part of the "but it has to be this way" illusion by which political elites have trained people to limit our political imaginations for decades. People should run who feel moved to run, and everyone should have a chance to hear their ideas. Three people are running for the Democratic nomination in 2024 and three people should be seen together on a debate stage. *That* is the democratic way.

May 5, 2023 · 12:32 PM UTC

545
721
154
4,254
Replying to @marwilliamson
Am I confused here? Didn't you run against Trump? Weren't you a member of the then GOP?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Get a JOB, Lady. Seriously…
Replying to @marwilliamson
and then what happened?
Replying to @marwilliamson
They were qualified to lead, you’re not.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I totally agree. Shame it won't happen.
Replying to @marwilliamson
But there is something wrong with using the campaign to sell books. Usually a Republican thing.
Replying to @marwilliamson
People would have thought it to be incredibly weird if they were just authors with no political experience. On the contrary actually. They had some top tier political experience.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Just want to check: what happened after those elections you reference?