When I was young, Eugene McCarthy and Bobby Kennedy challenged the sitting president, LBJ. No one thought it was weird for them to do so. In 1980, Teddy Kennedy challenged the sitting president, Jimmy Carter. No one thought it was weird for him to do so. People simply thought that was the democratic process. Because it is. The narrative that there's something *wrong* with challenging an incumbent president - as though there's an unwritten rule that it's a bad idea - is ridiculous. It's part of the "but it has to be this way" illusion by which political elites have trained people to limit our political imaginations for decades. People should run who feel moved to run, and everyone should have a chance to hear their ideas. Three people are running for the Democratic nomination in 2024 and three people should be seen together on a debate stage. *That* is the democratic way.

May 5, 2023 · 12:32 PM UTC

545
721
154
4,254
Replying to @marwilliamson
The democratic process has become quite unpopular with the two duopoly parties.
Replying to @marwilliamson
In both those examples the Democrats lost the presidential election. Clearly that is what you want to happen.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Did not go well for Bobby though
Replying to @marwilliamson
I knew Ted Kennedy. Ted Kennedy was a friend of mine. And you, lady, are no Ted Kennedy.
Replying to @marwilliamson
“How long? Not long, because ‘truth crushed to earth will rise again.’”
Replying to @marwilliamson
Go back to praying to your crystal collection that you’ll be President. Ain’t gonna happen.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Listen here jack, you're no ted kennedy
Replying to @marwilliamson
Very few people older than 19 like you.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Your examples are the reason people are so opposed to primarying a sitting President. You did not address that obvious point for a reason, and that is all I need to know.