When I was young, Eugene McCarthy and Bobby Kennedy challenged the sitting president, LBJ. No one thought it was weird for them to do so. In 1980, Teddy Kennedy challenged the sitting president, Jimmy Carter. No one thought it was weird for him to do so. People simply thought that was the democratic process. Because it is. The narrative that there's something *wrong* with challenging an incumbent president - as though there's an unwritten rule that it's a bad idea - is ridiculous. It's part of the "but it has to be this way" illusion by which political elites have trained people to limit our political imaginations for decades. People should run who feel moved to run, and everyone should have a chance to hear their ideas. Three people are running for the Democratic nomination in 2024 and three people should be seen together on a debate stage. *That* is the democratic way.

May 5, 2023 · 12:32 PM UTC

545
721
154
4,254
Replying to @marwilliamson
Many people thought it was “weird” for Kennedy to challenge Carter. This contributed to many democrats voting for Reagan and you don’t need to be a historian to see that a second Carter Administration would have been better for all
Replying to @marwilliamson
Biden knows he’s skating on thin ice.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Madame,you're not RFK,Eugene McCarthy(although he was a grifter just like you) or Ted Kennedy
Replying to @marwilliamson
People are very politically tribal. In fighting is seen as a betrayal to the party. The whole blue no matter who and lesser of two evils feeds the concept. We the people need to demand better.
Replying to @marwilliamson
History fails if you cannot connect the dots. I'm puzzled that a woman who's in touch w her truth and spiritual being is unable to learn from history. Relevance
Replying to @marwilliamson
We want primaries
Replying to @marwilliamson
Go home, ma’am.
Replying to @marwilliamson
You are no more a serious candidate than you were in 2020