.@AOC is deeply correct about this.
This honestly feels like a new low: not being able to clearly condemn a public murder because the victim was of a social status some would deem “too low” to care about. The last sentence is especially rich from an admin trying to cut the very services that could have helped him.

May 4, 2023 · 12:12 AM UTC

142
93
6
1,076
Replying to @marwilliamson @AOC
Guess who doesn’t ride the subway….
1
Replying to @marwilliamson @AOC
but is a murder which is what she called it? the reasonable progressive position would be "the system failed Neely which is what led to his death"
2
Replying to @marwilliamson @AOC
Too many racist responses to block
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
So you and @AOC support men who routinely assault women who attempt to murder someone by pushing onto the tracks, who preys upon women in confined spaces where they have no escape. GOOD TO KNOW
1
Replying to @marwilliamson @AOC
She and you are both deeply incorrect
1
4
Replying to @marwilliamson @AOC
Marianne won’t flip until it happens to her.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson @AOC
Deeply dishonest, actually. You guys think you can be judge and jury and you know nothing.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson @AOC
It's not because the guy had low social status, nor that people didn't care about him for that reason. You may agree with AOC; I don't. But it's not a question about anyone being "correct."
1
Replying to @marwilliamson @AOC
Not condemning someone is not a new low for this county
2