To be clear: The “anti-science” candidate is one who would increase oil drilling and approve the Willow Project, given that the majority of scientists of the world are urging us to ramp down fossil fuel extraction immediately. The “pro-science” candidate one who would cancel the Willow project on her first day in office. The “anti-medicine” candidate is one who will not support a public option, and says he’d refuse to sign a Medicare For All bill. The “pro-medicine” candidate is someone who stands for universal healthcare. Smears do not change the truth; they just obscure it. But only for so long.

Apr 30, 2023 · 4:02 PM UTC

199
379
46
2,195
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
8
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson
With all due respect Ms Williamson, the presidency is not a dictatorship or a monarchy. You can’t just say I’m going to change X or Y. Although I may agree with your positions on a number of areas, we need new leaders that are not beholden to special interests to get change.
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes now you need to address these differences. Even if he is “nice”.
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
This from the lunatic who wrote in her book that "sickness is illusion" and that "diseases like cancer and AIDS are a physical manifestation of a psychic scream." But sure, go on about science you kook.
1
2
6
Replying to @marwilliamson
1
5
Replying to @marwilliamson
"Majority of scientists" is meaningless. We don't vote on scientific truth.
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
Common on Marianne... The no more drilling rhetoric is simply play acting for when @POTUS @JoeBiden is on the campaign trailer. By November 2024 no one will remember the Willow Project lapse.
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
.@marwilliamson, thus said, will you ban fracking and offshore drilling?
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Debate him. Just the 2 of you. Kennedy's policies are much sounder and much more informed. He knows how to get things done. You have no idea what you are talking about.
3
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
You've never been elected, you have no track record to measure your words against your results. This is not the time for an experimental, untried candidate. Expertise matters. You should fear the untested people who feel entitled to begin at the top.
1
1
Load more