To be clear: The “anti-science” candidate is one who would increase oil drilling and approve the Willow Project, given that the majority of scientists of the world are urging us to ramp down fossil fuel extraction immediately. The “pro-science” candidate one who would cancel the Willow project on her first day in office. The “anti-medicine” candidate is one who will not support a public option, and says he’d refuse to sign a Medicare For All bill. The “pro-medicine” candidate is someone who stands for universal healthcare. Smears do not change the truth; they just obscure it. But only for so long.

Apr 30, 2023 · 4:02 PM UTC

199
379
46
2,196
Replying to @marwilliamson
Jill Stein 2.0 opposes nuclear power. She is not serious.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I can give you thousands of scientists that can prove you're full of shit. Just like your campaign.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Please get off my page. Why would run for president? You would have no collation to get anything done other than executive orders. I would support you running for congress not the presidency.