To be clear: The “anti-science” candidate is one who would increase oil drilling and approve the Willow Project, given that the majority of scientists of the world are urging us to ramp down fossil fuel extraction immediately. The “pro-science” candidate one who would cancel the Willow project on her first day in office. The “anti-medicine” candidate is one who will not support a public option, and says he’d refuse to sign a Medicare For All bill. The “pro-medicine” candidate is someone who stands for universal healthcare. Smears do not change the truth; they just obscure it. But only for so long.

Apr 30, 2023 · 4:02 PM UTC

199
379
46
2,195
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
💯 on the issues you referred to including the most important issue, climate change. Of course you're better than Biden But your record is not pro science. You would have to denounce many of your previous positions and statements to be legitimately considered pro-science.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Sounds good to me
Replying to @marwilliamson
Let's go
Replying to @marwilliamson
Pathetic 🤡🇷🇺
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Says the woman who was surprised at work Trudeau said… Reference the appearance on Bill Maher recently. I love your spiritual work but you don’t know what’s going on in the world which is surprising
Replying to @marwilliamson
I’m proudly pro-fossil fuel which is a misnomer in itself. We don’t need another destructive President in the US. Just ask 🇱🇰
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
along with the one who hasn’t stood for medical freedom
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
You have a very shallow understanding of this topic, and you would impoverish us over a crisis that is extremely unlikely to ever occur.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Haha “Believe the Science TM” thanks you for your support.
Load more