To be clear: The “anti-science” candidate is one who would increase oil drilling and approve the Willow Project, given that the majority of scientists of the world are urging us to ramp down fossil fuel extraction immediately. The “pro-science” candidate one who would cancel the Willow project on her first day in office. The “anti-medicine” candidate is one who will not support a public option, and says he’d refuse to sign a Medicare For All bill. The “pro-medicine” candidate is someone who stands for universal healthcare. Smears do not change the truth; they just obscure it. But only for so long.

Apr 30, 2023 · 4:02 PM UTC

199
379
46
2,195
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
neither science does not dictate choices, it gives options and possible results
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Joe Biden also committed a terrorist act by blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline, & sending tons of methane gas into the Baltic Sea.
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Just another tweet showing that she doesn't know what she's talking about. Marianne Williamson is #AJoke!
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
I personally agree, but a big blocker is people who are paying their last dime for gas heating their trailer in winter. How can they ignore their immediate crisis in favor of an existential one they are told is real by people they don't trust? No one seems to address this.
7
Replying to @marwilliamson
U assume everyone wants your "healthcare." The medical industry doesn't have the best track record. Many will do anything to AVOID ever needing to utilize the dangerous medical industry True healthcare begins w/clean food, water, exercise, proper sleep. Not with a Drug Prescriber
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Thank you for your voice Marianne
6
Replying to @marwilliamson
"I define pro-science and pro-medicine to mean agreeing with my policy positions, so if you don't agree with my policy positions you're clearly anti-science and anti-medicine." And then, having smeared your opponents as anti-science and anti-medicine, you denounce smears...
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
All of these issues would be great for the 2028 election cycle. Time and place. You can’t defeat Trump.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
I assume you mean Trump as the anti-science candidate
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
Aren’t you supposed to be going against Joe Biden? 🤔
1
Load more