To be clear: The “anti-science” candidate is one who would increase oil drilling and approve the Willow Project, given that the majority of scientists of the world are urging us to ramp down fossil fuel extraction immediately. The “pro-science” candidate one who would cancel the Willow project on her first day in office. The “anti-medicine” candidate is one who will not support a public option, and says he’d refuse to sign a Medicare For All bill. The “pro-medicine” candidate is someone who stands for universal healthcare. Smears do not change the truth; they just obscure it. But only for so long.

Apr 30, 2023 · 4:02 PM UTC

199
379
46
2,195
Replying to @marwilliamson
This is so much better for the environment. Oh well, it's OK since this isn't done in the United States. euronews.com/green/2022/02/0…
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
I love the fact that you're running against Joe Biden. What I have a problem with is that when you lose that you're going to tell us to vote for Joe Biden, an obviously corporate meat puppet with dementia.
1
5
Replying to @marwilliamson
I guess war is on the table since you support apartheid against the Palestinian people.
3
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Great statement! Keep making people question the pathetic administration.
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
The "pro-union" candidate denied against workers rights 3 days before christmas. I look forward to seeing where your campaign goes.
5
Replying to @marwilliamson
if you are not clearly and coherently anti war and opposed to what NATO does, I cannot take you seriously