To be clear: The “anti-science” candidate is one who would increase oil drilling and approve the Willow Project, given that the majority of scientists of the world are urging us to ramp down fossil fuel extraction immediately. The “pro-science” candidate one who would cancel the Willow project on her first day in office. The “anti-medicine” candidate is one who will not support a public option, and says he’d refuse to sign a Medicare For All bill. The “pro-medicine” candidate is someone who stands for universal healthcare. Smears do not change the truth; they just obscure it. But only for so long.

Apr 30, 2023 · 4:02 PM UTC

199
379
46
2,196
Replying to @marwilliamson
“We will not allow you to steal and destroy the energy that makes our lives bearable. And produces our food and shelter…”. Jordan Peterson.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Talk about heath science. As in your comments about COVID. That science, which involves vaccines. Not geological science.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Science is used and cherry-picked to serve an agenda the same as republicans use God to serve and agenda. Neither side has really taken Science or God seriously unless it’s sexy to do so. #Truth #Politics
Replying to @marwilliamson
Which one is the anti-US hegemony/pro-peace candidate?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes, let’s start by making all cities with a population over 1 million completely green with no fossil fuels.
Replying to @marwilliamson
The 4 billion year old planet has been destroyed in 100 years, I’m 100% certain you have zero idea how our climate actually works…..