To be clear: The “anti-science” candidate is one who would increase oil drilling and approve the Willow Project, given that the majority of scientists of the world are urging us to ramp down fossil fuel extraction immediately. The “pro-science” candidate one who would cancel the Willow project on her first day in office. The “anti-medicine” candidate is one who will not support a public option, and says he’d refuse to sign a Medicare For All bill. The “pro-medicine” candidate is someone who stands for universal healthcare. Smears do not change the truth; they just obscure it. But only for so long.

Apr 30, 2023 · 4:02 PM UTC

199
379
46
2,195
Replying to @marwilliamson
Keep going. The truth needs to be said. We need to stop enabling the status quo with incrementalism & cooped language. We need to unleash the innovation of the American people. #bigtruth #boldaction #innovation
1
11
Replying to @marwilliamson
To be clear. A pro-science candidate would understand that there is not a single branch of science that does not prove that capitalism is an invalid ideology. Everything from Anthropology to sociology. And even Physics.
1
6
Replying to @marwilliamson
Keep fighting Marianne! They are trying to bury you because they don’t wanna clean up their act and you’re threatening their criminal ways!
5
Replying to @marwilliamson
The serious candidate would increase drilling and healthcare
Replying to @marwilliamson
world needs you!!!!
Replying to @marwilliamson
But you're woefully unqualified so.....
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
He never said he was anti-public option. And M4A is nothing more than a slogan. No country on this planet has anything like what BS quickly jotted into a few pages. None. There are different models different countries use, but none have the all encompassing 100% head to toe
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
You’re could’ve just been honest neat and typed “I have no clue how the government works and I’m just here to grift and suppress votes”. It would’ve been a lot less short and not full of lies.
1