To be clear: The “anti-science” candidate is one who would increase oil drilling and approve the Willow Project, given that the majority of scientists of the world are urging us to ramp down fossil fuel extraction immediately. The “pro-science” candidate one who would cancel the Willow project on her first day in office. The “anti-medicine” candidate is one who will not support a public option, and says he’d refuse to sign a Medicare For All bill. The “pro-medicine” candidate is someone who stands for universal healthcare. Smears do not change the truth; they just obscure it. But only for so long.

Apr 30, 2023 · 4:02 PM UTC

199
379
46
2,195
Replying to @marwilliamson
Bullshit on any majority of scientists who don't directly benefit from anti-fossil fuel funding.
Replying to @marwilliamson
You mean the majority of democrat communist politicians. Fixed it for ya.
Replying to @marwilliamson
A world of 8 billion people cannot run without fossil fuels ... Look at how much environmental degradation there will be mining for all the materials needed for EVs. The climate change folks have just become extremists in a new cult.
2
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
You shame antidepressants and folks who use them. What’s your plan for mitigating the raging eugenics and genocide by psycho Joe’s let it rip en masse disabling and murdering with Co vid? Sit down.
2
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
You don't even know what science is...
Replying to @marwilliamson
How about the ones that don't get men don't belong in women's sports.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Replying to @marwilliamson
Since we're being clear and all.
Replying to @marwilliamson
They don’t respect you. Do you care?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Well then I just don’t understand why you like the anti science and the anti medicine so very much. I mean we knew he was this person due to his 40+ year long legislative record yet here you are 👇
🇵🇸 🅲🅷🆄🅲🅺🇾🇪 @benigma2017
9 Apr 2023
Replying to @peterdaou
Seems she really likes the guy:
1
Load more