Yep. A blatant lie. When they say “he has no challengers,” they mean he has no challengers that THEY approve of! To them, a “qualified challenger” is someone who will effectuate and perpetuate the system as it is… the system within which they themselves are doing fine. That they call themselves champions of democracy is an increasingly tenuous description.
.@JaneMayerNYer, I have enjoyed your podcast 'The Political Scene' until the current episode in which you tell the blatant LIE that @JoeBiden has NO primary opponent, knowing full well he has TWO: @MarWilliamson & @RobertKennedyJr. It is journalistic malfeasance to ignore them.

Apr 30, 2023 · 3:54 PM UTC

129
193
16
892
Replying to @marwilliamson
How can anyone approve of a you as a challenger, when you think Black people shouldn't have the right to vote is beyond me. How can anyone approves you as a challenger when you can't explain how you can get 60 votes in the Senate to pass UHC?
1
9
Replying to @marwilliamson
Where's the lie? You're not qualified to run a fruit stand.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
The fascists aren’t at the door. They are here, inside, now!
3
You sound like a Republican.... I am just as qualified to run for President as u... You are a grifter
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Make a persuasive case with polling and funding data and take it to the DNC. Litigating grievance on Twitter won't change institutional policy, only foment victimization. "In my defenselessness my safety lies" you expertly taught weekly at Harmony Gold. Respectfully, practice it.
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Nothing could “effectuate and perpetuate” a system more strongly than running as a democrat inside a two party system. It’s ironic that by this standard you are extremely qualified, and yet still, everyone knows you would suck at being president.
5
13
Replying to @marwilliamson
You will 💯 endorse him in less than a year
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
They mean that he doesn't have any challengers of importance. 🥴
2