Yep. A blatant lie. When they say “he has no challengers,” they mean he has no challengers that THEY approve of! To them, a “qualified challenger” is someone who will effectuate and perpetuate the system as it is… the system within which they themselves are doing fine. That they call themselves champions of democracy is an increasingly tenuous description.
.@JaneMayerNYer, I have enjoyed your podcast 'The Political Scene' until the current episode in which you tell the blatant LIE that @JoeBiden has NO primary opponent, knowing full well he has TWO: @MarWilliamson & @RobertKennedyJr. It is journalistic malfeasance to ignore them.

Apr 30, 2023 · 3:54 PM UTC

129
193
16
892
Replying to @marwilliamson
GO ON THE OFFENSIVE
Replying to @marwilliamson
When I saw "no challenger", I mean somebody who has more than a snowball's chance in hell of actually winning. That's you and that's RFKJr. not a chance.
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
How are you going to convince him to debate you? Because neither you or RFK Jr. have a prayer if he doesn't.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Just keep being you, Marianne - you are supported
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
The “who anyone should take seriously” is clearly implied.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
You’re a terrible human being. Preying on people who are ignorant of how government works so that you can make a dollar. I’d say “shame on you”, but I know you lack shame and humility. Gross.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
He has no challengers that could come close to beating him.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Regarding the fidelity of Party to principle: principles either stand up, or they fall down. Both giant national Parties are hypocritical to their principles. The laws of truth, freedom and justice imply that neither of these parties is stable.