Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
Looks like they added you 6 hours ago. Although the damage is done by then
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
So messed up!!! I can't believe how obvious they are being, while people still see Reuters as being objective, neutral, etc.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson @kthalps
Yeah there's somebody missing from that list....
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
This is as expected as Maryanne's feigned outrage. She's just trying to sell her book, and ya'll are falling for it.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
You need a new word.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
So they have Vivek Ramaswamy and Glenn Youngkin as legit candidate but not marianne williamson? You can't tell me these entries are objective when people who have FAAAAR less support or shot at winning apparently make Reuters listing. conservative democrats are wild
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
They used different Font: "RFK VAX DENIER" Anyone but him.... #RFKJr2024 #JFK
Replying to @marwilliamson
I remember when Reuters reported news. Guess they're done with that.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Aren’t you running as Dem so you won’t be ignored? At least that’s what you’ve claimed so far. 😂 🤡
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Article completely ignored Marianne. RFK Jr mentioned but he was the only one whose name wasn't emboldened, as if we were meant to completely scroll past and miss him. Funny that the Repub candidates getting treated better than the Dems.
2
2
17
Load more