Also the left: There are over 100 genders, to not agree is a hate crime and denying science. And, killing kids is bad, unless it's before they're born! Also, lets not forget, we need to keep pretending bad weather is a new thing. We have an agenda here!

Models, by design, are typically inaccurate. Why would it be any difference here?

I'm not here to defend Singer as I know nothing about him, but your "existential climate threat" messaging is nothing short of junk political science. Is Bjorn Lomborg also peddling junk science? The dishonesty of your attack, and faux moral virtue, are reprehensible

We should all be dead according to the climate science of the 70s 80s 90s 00s. Its the boy who cried wolf, sorry if I dont believe you. I can't cook my pasta in the ocean yet. Im not a JP fan btw, find him unlistenable half the time

On the flip side, you have scientists who would lose their jobs if anthropogenic climate change was false arguing that it's real and apocalyptic.

💯 👏🏼 🌍 Taking a generously sympathetic view, JP’s naïveté astounds me considering the thoughtfulness with which he carries himself.

That you positioned your campaign to invest in your twitter feed makes your campaign dead on arrival. You'll never be president and you don't even deserve to be a part of the political conversation.

GET EM MARIANNE!