One judge in Texas should not have the right to tell millions of women all over the country what we can and cannot do with our bodies. This is not just about abortion; it’s about an effort to control women. And we will not be controlled. npr.org/2023/04/07/115922045…

Judges' dueling decisions put access to a key abortion drug in jeopardy nationwide

A federal judge in Texas stayed the FDA's approval of the drug mifepristone, while a federal judge in Washington state blocked any FDA change in access.

npr.org

Apr 8, 2023 · 6:58 PM UTC

74
169
9
827
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
Two Federal Judges Issued Opposing Rulings on Abortion Pills - One invalidated the F.D.A.'s approval of the abortion pill mifepristone - The other ordered the F.D.A. to do nothing to restrict the pill's availability!!!
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
It’s about protecting human life.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
#WarOnWomen #RepublicanTaliban 😡
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Connecticut v Griswold is next
Replying to @marwilliamson
Now do covid vaccines
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
But we will continue to use this issue as an election issue and never actually do anything about it as promised 🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️ I find it hard to believe you guys don’t hear how ridiculous just about everything that’s tweeted sounds. Then again Americans are addicted to propaganda 🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
6
10
Replying to @marwilliamson
Like a vaccine mandate?
8
1
16
Replying to @marwilliamson
I'm curious... How many judges does it take Maryanne? You weren't happy when 6 SCOTUS Justices did it... Not happy when a circuit Court Judge does it... I bet you'd have no problem if a single liberal judge took gun rights from millions of people.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Only 700k abortions needed last year out of 50 million child bearing women. This is not a hill for parties to die on. Genetic screening of couples for inherited diseases more urgent
1
Load more