One judge in Texas should not have the right to tell millions of women all over the country what we can and cannot do with our bodies. This is not just about abortion; it’s about an effort to control women. And we will not be controlled. npr.org/2023/04/07/115922045…

Apr 8, 2023 · 6:58 PM UTC

74
169
9
827
Replying to @marwilliamson
Why do democrats want to kill babies so bad?
Replying to @marwilliamson
It’s about killing babies. That is all it is about.
The Supreme Court struck down the Biden administration mandates.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
You and your flavor of lefty helped deliver this exact thing to us with your 🤡 actions vis a vis the 2016 election
Replying to @marwilliamson
That is exactly what the government you support has done, illegally, with the 'vaccine' bioweapon mandates and suppression of cheap and effective treatments. This step has been done on a point of law, which may or may not stand.
Replying to @marwilliamson
unless you're controlled opposition. which you are
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Maybe we can wrap the judges in a golden egg with the power of our minds and awaken them! 🤪
2
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
Such a critical development. Progressives need to reproduce this form of protection in the states where common sense Justices preside. We can preemptively legislate & weaken the broad overreach attempted by the GQP extremists.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Does that mean that a single judge can stop ANY drug they don’t agree with? Isn’t it a Pandora’s box to open?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Why didn't you call out Nancy Pelosi when she supported an anti-choice Democrat in the primaries? Why haven't you called out Obama for not codifying Roe when he had a majority in Congress?