That’s like saying if you want traffic laws, you are an enemy of driving. That’s it. That’s the tweet.
If you want to ban AR-15s, you are an enemy of the Second Amendment. That’s it. That’s the tweet.

Mar 28, 2023 · 5:36 PM UTC

318
813
48
5,669
Replying to @marwilliamson
People need to take to the streets across the country. Mass disruption.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Good job Marianne. This dunk tweet brought the 3 children back to life and AR-15s can still be purchased.
1
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Banning AR-15s won’t stop them from being owned by people if anything people will start getting them illegally. If you want to stop shootings compare yourself to other countries that have high gun owning rates and low shooting rates like Switzerland.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Instead of going after guns, why doesn’t the government do something about the mental health problem that the United States has? There is a reason the United States hasn’t been invaded.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Basically they are saying most people specifically mention AR-15 because they don’t known what they are taking about, and people who are uninformed can’t be fair when making laws. All guns shoot, so when they say AR-15 it’s instant giveaway it’s pure politics, no credibility
1
I want traffic laws and I am an enemy of driving
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Driving isn't in the constitution though. A better analogy would be 'if you want speech laws, you are an enemy of the 1st amendment'. Which follows for book banning rightoid fascists. Work on your analogies though crystal mommy.
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Your quote tweet game is on 🔥 today. ❤️
8
Replying to @marwilliamson
i am an enemy of driving. take the train
1
17
Replying to @marwilliamson
So using this cars example is there in any laws, amendments, writing, or judicial statutes the strictly state that the ability to own and have cars shall not be infringed for any reason?
1