That’s like saying if you want traffic laws, you are an enemy of driving. That’s it. That’s the tweet.
If you want to ban AR-15s, you are an enemy of the Second Amendment. That’s it. That’s the tweet.

Mar 28, 2023 · 5:36 PM UTC

318
813
48
5,669
Replying to @marwilliamson
Driving isn’t a constitutional right!
Replying to @marwilliamson
They are not the same. The federal government needs to back off. The job of the federal government is to regulate the states, not the individuals in those states. I understand why people want gun regulations, but keep it to your state.
Replying to @marwilliamson
But NRA supports a fully automatic gun ban. So under that logic they're an enemy of 2nd amendment
Replying to @marwilliamson
No. What you’re suggesting is not like traffic laws. It’s like abolishing cars. And yes, if you are for that , you the enemy of driving. The funny thing is, a lot of people who want to take away our guns DO also want to take away our cars (for climate change or some such)
Replying to @marwilliamson
It's more like: If you want to ban stop signs, you're an enemy of traffic laws. And there would be truth in that.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Driving isn't a constitutionally protected right. You all like to quote the "well regulated militia" part but totally ignore the "the right of the PEOPLE" part or even "Shall not be infringed" part. It's written very plainly and you still quibble over what it means.
Replying to @marwilliamson
You lost me at That’s it. That’s the tweet.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Don't conflate Laws with Bans. Intellectual laziness Marianne. Sad.
Replying to @marwilliamson
We have gun laws. What else ya got?