That’s like saying if you want traffic laws, you are an enemy of driving. That’s it. That’s the tweet.
If you want to ban AR-15s, you are an enemy of the Second Amendment. That’s it. That’s the tweet.

Mar 28, 2023 · 5:36 PM UTC

318
813
48
5,668
Replying to @marwilliamson
Driving isn’t an inalienable right you mong
Replying to @marwilliamson
Wow, you are smarter than that, but let’s play. Maybe you would say “…ban ford trucks” would be a better analogy. Which, btw, still falls flat, because driving is a privilege and not protected in the constitution… those should not have eluded you…
Replying to @marwilliamson
No it doesn’t. If you were an enemy of driving you would want to ban vehicles.
Replying to @marwilliamson
No it isn't, not to them. They compare it to banning pickup trucks and SUVS, forcing everyone drive hybrid sedans and hatchbacks. Their argument is that the 2nd Amendment allows them any kind of "death weapon" they can dream of... purpose is to stop GOVERNMENT ENFORCEMENT.
Replying to @marwilliamson
How about - People drive drunk & kill people. Therefore, cars are bad & automobiles must be banned
Replying to @marwilliamson
How many children must die on the altar of the Second Amendment!
Replying to @marwilliamson
The mentally ill should never own a weapon. Let’s start a petition for background checks to require disclosure of affiliation with various organizations such as LBGTQ
Replying to @marwilliamson
Winding up mentally I’ll people and setting them lose to cause mass carnage with a gun in order to whip up support for disarming the population is nothing new. Problem-Reaction-Solution We see right through this, we are awake.
Replying to @marwilliamson
So...if you respect the Second Ammendment that's implying you're ok with everyone having an AR-15...?
Replying to @marwilliamson
More like if you want to stop car crashes you are against people driving.