That’s like saying if you want traffic laws, you are an enemy of driving. That’s it. That’s the tweet.
If you want to ban AR-15s, you are an enemy of the Second Amendment. That’s it. That’s the tweet.

Mar 28, 2023 · 5:36 PM UTC

318
813
48
5,669
Replying to @marwilliamson
Driving is not protected by the Constitution, and is not a critical right to protect our freedom. So, you're wrong.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Glad you won’t be President… but maybe background checks for cars are good because that’s what a leftist will use next just like a jihadi.
Replying to @marwilliamson
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" THE KEY WORDS ARE -"Well Regulated"- and - "Militia" - These imply a - CONTROLLED - right! - Not an - ABSOLUTE - Right!
21
1
1
13
Replying to @marwilliamson
Ban all assault vehicles!
1
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson
How about enforcing laws that are in the books. Most Democrat do not…ever wonder why?
Replying to @marwilliamson
There are gun laws. Criminals break them. Banning guns is disagreeable with the 2A. Banning cars is disagreeable with driving privileges. Bad drivers can also lose their driving privileges. My health forced me to voluntarily give up my privileges.
Replying to @marwilliamson
You made like a 200 on the SAT analogies part, didn't you?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
It's almost like we have a constitution or something 🤔
Replying to @marwilliamson
Not exactly, it would be more like if you want to ban cars then you are an enemy of personal transportation! The NRA used the word Ban, you used the word “ if you want” two completely different things!