The status quo will not disrupt itself. The idea that only those whose careers have been entrenched within a system that drove us into a ditch should possibly be considered qualified to lead us out of it is absurd. We don’t need the expertise to perpetuate that system; we need the expertise to disrupt it.

Mar 25, 2023 · 6:55 PM UTC

48
126
12
748
Replying to @marwilliamson
We the people need a law to imprison public servants “when a public servant does not serve the public he/she/they are hired to represent”.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
The system has got to go now, lobbists first.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Sounds like a MAGA CRY!
Replying to @marwilliamson
The last guy disrupted the system and we need competence now to face the threats from within and without. To quote you, "Snap out of it." 🚩You were unable to lead a church successfully. 🚩No college degree. 🚩No management experience You are not qualified 2B President.
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
How would you know if it has already Marianne? What does disruption look like to you? It's an important question. You and @BernieSanders have similar perspectives on this and I'm intrigued
4
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Why is @tiktok_us really being banned by Congress? Is this government censorship disguised as safety or just a power grab by Meta? #tiktokban
Replying to @marwilliamson
There is no one more than you, entrenched in the capitalist status quo. Which is exactly why nobody should expect you to disrupt capital. Televangelism is not really a disruptive career move.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
The status quo will not be disrupted from within a corrupt party.
17
Replying to @marwilliamson
If you're running as a candidate in either half of the duopoly you are the very epitome of status quo politics. So we've established you're only saying hollow words based on zero principles and... ...hard pass. #TranscendTheDuopoly
1
2