So apparently only those who've had careers entrenched in the machine that drove us into the ditch should possibly be considered "qualified" to lead us out of it. (They're done such a bang up job and all.) Squirm, darlings. We see you.

Feb 27, 2023 路 4:06 PM UTC

263
375
76
2,991
Replying to @marwilliamson
No one is squirming because you you, we all just have to pee really badly.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Credit where due. You make a good point. That being said, nobody is squirming. You're a nutball, and have no chance. Still a valid point though
Replying to @marwilliamson
You鈥檙e an interesting chick and easy on the eyes, as my mother would say, but you鈥檙e not a serious candidate for the Presidency. I do wish you could be your party鈥檚 Eugene McCarthy, tho. The Democrat Party w/out an anti-war movement at a time like this is a joke.
Replying to @marwilliamson
So apparently you think we are all fools and don't know this is all about you and your grift?
Replying to @marwilliamson
When people ask me questions about qualifications for the POTUS job, I always refer them to @jdickerson 's recent book The Hardest Job In the World. You can find it in hardback, paper bound or as an ebook I think it's essential reading when the subject like this comes up
1
8
Replying to @marwilliamson
I woke up this morning having a different reaction to this from yesterday's. Today, I wrote the titles of the first 50 lessons of ACIM in my journal. When I was done and I thought about this statement and thought it inconsistent with Course teachings. JMO.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Can't wait to see you on the debate stage! (Assuming the Dems let you up there 馃槄)
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Naw, but somebody who obviously hates a party and the voters in that party, should probably not seek to be a nominee of that party... Of course, you hardly got any votes in any primaries, so voters reject you as well. Stick to your crystals, auras and other esoteric pursuits
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Replying to @business
Does the President have the power to unilaterally, HELP PEOPLE? Thats the legal question