So apparently only those who've had careers entrenched in the machine that drove us into the ditch should possibly be considered "qualified" to lead us out of it. (They're done such a bang up job and all.) Squirm, darlings. We see you.

Feb 27, 2023 · 4:06 PM UTC

263
375
76
2,991
Replying to @marwilliamson
In science, we debate based on facts and somebody will concede on the grounds of empirical data. Tell a politician the sky is blue and they'll chastise you for ignoring that the grass is green. Stop listening to the handlers that tell you to distance yourself from your opponent
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
College dropout, inventor of fake religions, huckster. Those are your qualifications. As you’re 71 (at least), you’re also way too old to be running for a job you have no friggin’ idea about.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
If we cannot solve a problem at the same level that created the problem, then we also cannot rely on those who created the problem to solve the problem. How can I support you?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Its a private club and we're not in it.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
I’ll settle for someone who doesn’t think we can solve out problems with crystals or other New Age nonsense.
5
23
Replying to @marwilliamson
You mean the ones you tell us to vote for and protect, darling? We see you.
5
Replying to @marwilliamson
If it walks like a #Democrat & talks like a #Democrat then I will vote #GreenParty again.
Replying to @marwilliamson
A lifetime of enriching corporatists but telling regular folks that means tested to death ineffective programs is all that can be done seems to be the only resume requirement, not sure how they can do anything else
2