We made fun of the Republicans for voting however many times in order to elect McCarthy their House leader, but it's as worrisome to me that the Democrats hardly had an election at all. It was just, "Nancy says it's Hakeem, so...." See a pattern here?

Feb 21, 2023 · 2:55 AM UTC

240
251
23
2,570
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
You’re right. Every time I see a tweet from Jeffries I ask “Who are you?” His tweets are always highly partisan and he gaslights on certain subjects regularly. (Such as Social Security).
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
And @cnn ran a chyron blasting the GOP for selecting an election denier in MI but did not do the same for Hakeem and the House Dems. Why is that @ChristineRomans?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
It's more than a pattern. Leadership elections are not appointed, they are voted on. Democrats don't like voting.
Replying to @marwilliamson
You’re embarrassing yourself! Stop.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yep, the dems are in lockstep. Good call
Replying to @marwilliamson
When it is someone as smart, as well- liked and as respected as Jeffries, and there are no others coming forward and no objections, why waste energy?
Replying to @marwilliamson
What about the fact that the entire fake progressive establishment media straight up lied to thier audience claiming the squad couldn't do exactly what the Republicans just did in order to force a floor vote on M4A?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
The democrats will goose step behind anyone they're told to regardless of their qualifications. The republicans don't play that hard.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Uh oh. Hakeem looks like an election denier.
Replying to @marwilliamson
It’s February 21st. It seems a bit late to even bring this up.
Load more