Ah the cry of the third party candidate who doesn’t understand that splitting the votes of democrats leads to Trumpism.

Ditto with the coronation of Hillary.

No, I see the opposite of a pattern. The Dems did the opposite of the Reps.

So what?

Democrats are lemmings. Libs are the lowest form of life on the planet. They can't think for themselves so Nasty Nancy does it for them.

The pattern is you misrepresenting how the Democratic caucus viewed the election for Speaker. But telling the truth isn't your strong suit.

Oh really...? What should've seemed "worrisome" to you is how quickly and resoundingly the voters rejected you during your short, but ill fated run for president. No thank you marianne, if we thought you had anything of value to offer, we would've voted for you.

Thing is, dissent in the GOP doesn’t threaten the donors’ profits, while dissent among Democrats does. Billionaires are fine with someone even more unhinged than McCarthy, as long as they still get their tax cuts. But anyone even SLIGHTLY left of Pelosi/Jeffries…forget it.

You gonna run third party grifter?

It's called consensus. When there aren't strong fractions and infighting in a group they often have collectively through social dialogue already come to an agreement as to best course. Rather than meeting large public displays of posturing, power and dominance. @marwilliamson