We made fun of the Republicans for voting however many times in order to elect McCarthy their House leader, but it's as worrisome to me that the Democrats hardly had an election at all. It was just, "Nancy says it's Hakeem, so...." See a pattern here?

Feb 21, 2023 · 2:55 AM UTC

240
251
23
2,570
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
That's your party.
8
Replying to @marwilliamson
This actually doesn't match the stories I've read from a variety of reputable sources. I understand Nancy was grooming Adam Schiff as her successor for years, but that Hakeem is the one who's been doing the work to prepare for this role. He has broad support among his colleagues.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Just go away. Nobody is interested in what you have to say. Go back to hawking your miracles course.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
If you like that, you’ll love @davidsirota and @LeverNews reporting on the @SecretaryPete Ohio train debacle.
David Sirota @davidsirota
13 Feb 2023
Pete Buttigieg has refused to reinstate and expand Obama-enacted, Trump-repealed rail safety rules, and yet liberals think their response to a mushroom cloud of carcinogens in Ohio should be to defend Pete — rather than demand he do his job. It’s grotesque.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Solid observation.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Damn girl! I just love ya to death! PLEASE RUN AGAIN!
Replying to @marwilliamson
Democrats and Republicans both had MONTHS between the Midterms ‘ final results and the official opening of Congress to sort out who would be their Speaker. GOP were chaos incarnate, Dems came to a unified consensus based on a trusted successful leader - why does that upset you?
1
19
Replying to @marwilliamson
You FINALLY freaking catching up?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Aren’t your the failed candidate who was so effing creepy that even the men got weirder out when u spoke?
Replying to @marwilliamson
I have no idea what you are talking about
Load more