Maybe don’t listen to the toxicologist and just listen to your heart.
Nā’ālehu Anthony asked Roger Brewer, Environmental Scientist for @HawaiiDOH, whether 266ppb of jet-fuel contaminated water they deem within ‘environmentally actionable levels’ as safe to drink. Brewer's response is shocking.

Dec 20, 2022 · 5:30 AM UTC

12
18
1
66
Replying to @marwilliamson
So, if I understand correctly, the question is would I want to drink jet fuel? I've got to say hard no on that one.
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Jet fuel in your drinking water ... is ... Jet fuel in your drinking water!
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
This story is for people who are bad a math. Jet fuel is kerosene, the least carcinogenic compound that gets distilled from petroleum, widely and safely used around the world for lighting. PPB equals parts per billion. This is an eye drop in a large swimming pool.
Replying to @marwilliamson
i can’t think of anyone who has been a bigger fan of putting toxic materials into people (including kids) than marianne williamson. complete moral failure.
1 of 2 Rachel Gierth from Arkadelphia Arkansas, came down with guillain barre syndrome after her second dose. It took her 9 months to be able to walk again, and then she had a second bout of GBS. She is now wheelchair bound and can’t stand, walk, work, or drive.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Who's paying his contract is the question.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Please help spread the word about how the US Military continues to threaten O’ahu’s water. They just spilled 1,300 gallons of toxic AFFF concentrate, and there’s still over 100 million gallons of jet fuel sitting just above our aquifer in the Navy’s leaking Red Hill facility!
The US Navy knew. Our representatives knew. The Chamber of Commerce knew. We tried to warn them about the leaking Red Hill Fuel Facility for years - but they ignored us. There's still time to stop the worst from happening. But it's going to take ALL of us to #ShutDownRedHill.
8
8
Replying to @marwilliamson
Actually, the toxicologist was honest in saying he wouldn't disagree, but had to toe the line for the standards established by government regulators. When it comes to chemicals in water though, shouldn't none be the standard?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Double-speak is the new normal -- maybe not so new? Maybe not so "normal"?