The president says he had to side with the railroad companies to get the problem solved before the xmas rush. But he could have decided to side with labor to get the problem solved before the xmas rush!

Nov 29, 2022 · 3:17 PM UTC

77
239
19
1,285
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
You keep complaining yet keep promoting the same failed administration and democrat agenda. You’re a nut!
Replying to @marwilliamson
He did…. These are difficult issues. The answer is not just give the employees what they want. Try running a business or a country
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Impotence vs. Power mongers. Tough choice.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Unfortunately he said this was fixed before the mid terms. What a liar!
Replying to @marwilliamson
Can we just be honest? He's a Reagan Democrat. He doesn't care about working-class folk; it's all been a game. He needed Obama to have everyone drop out to get the nomination, and if we didn't have the pandemic, he would have lost to a clown!
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
It's a fascinating approach, but also not unexpected when he's always been anti-people. Name one bill in his 45+ years where he wasn't serving corporate over people.
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Labor unions don't spend much buying presidents. I'm sure he got some more under the table money from one of his many owners the railroad for his "decision"..
Replying to @marwilliamson
A US president would never do that.
Replying to @marwilliamson
The government siding with one side over another to give favoritism is fascism. It's none of the governments business how industry is run at all. The workers already agreed to what they're getting when they accepted the job they applied for.
6
1
10
Load more