Those who condemn the expression of violence but are not willing to condemn the vigorous and consistent spread of irresponsible false narratives - especially when they know damn well they’re false - are as culpable of violence as are the vulnerable suckers who believe their lies.
45
70
4
274
You are insightful on many topics, so it's a disappointment how wrong you are on others. Living in a free society means we are exposed to false narratives, and every individual must act their own arbiter of truth. Words are powerful, but they are not violence.
3
3
33
Words are absolutely violence. Read a little history. Start with Germany and Rwanda.
7
3
Eww, how patronizing.
1
6
Yes, her condescension was uncalled for. (It happens that I've spent some time studying mass atrocities and the Rwandan genocide in particular, but that's beside the point.)
1
14
Then you know that people were on the radio calling other people cockroaches, day in and day out, 24 hours a day.

Oct 30, 2022 · 10:50 PM UTC

6
No one has ever died from being called a name. Perpetrators of violence are solely responsible for their own actions. Should we criminalize name-calling since it's now a form of violence? Repeal the First Amendment? Give up on the whole idea of liberal democracy?
2
8
1
58
Or like being called a “plague rat” for not getting this v@ccine? Is that not a lot bit n@zi??
Replying to @RemnantMd
And the Left views me as a “plague rat” for being against these v@ccines, masks, and lockdowns. Look-I made this socialist’s “plague rat” watch list!
1
Or like half of Democrats who said they wanted to arrest us or put us in concentration camps for not getting this v@ccine? ricochet.com/1122463/rasmuss…
Most of the country -predominantly The Left have been treating the unv@ccinated like they are sub human for a year and a half now . And YOU’RE bitching about being called a name? Piss 0ff!
It’s not what you’re called, it’s what you answer to. 🤷🏻‍♀️