Oz says he doesn’t want the federal govt involved in a woman’s reproductive decisions; he wants local & state politicians to “put the best ideas forward” & come up with solutions. He wants the decision made by “a woman, her doctor & local politicians.” That’s a “no” on choice.

Oct 26, 2022 · 12:38 PM UTC

42
39
2
249
Replying to @marwilliamson
In a world where any person hasn’t formed from void but from a‘village’of known n unknown people,’better’evolutionary movements includes everybody,else it becomes a Hitlerish nightmare that affects generations.A woman is a complementary partner n more so as a mother by nurture.
Replying to @marwilliamson
...a woman, her doctor, the town mayor...
Replying to @marwilliamson
Fetterman is not qualified to do the job, and you know it. You and your entire pathetic party should be ENRAGED with him and his power-hungry wife for not dropping out of the race. Instead you peddle this nonsense.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Limitations are in order. Anything else is utterly barbaric Ms Spirituality.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
He's saying Government should be involved in a women's right to choose. I say it's hard no to Oz. I'd rather have Fetterman who has a disability on office cuz he believes in Democracy/
2
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
That “no” on choice absurdly matches the de facto position of the leader of House Democrats
Oz sounds kinda like Nancy Pelosi and Henry Cuellar.
1
5
Replying to @marwilliamson
I re-watched it a few times thinking it must be a parody. Please, get rid of this guy. And is Fetterman for fracking? Why is the climate change crises being ignored at such a critical time?
Replying to @marwilliamson
When did Dr. Oz get so dang crazy! Don’t vote for Oz.
Replying to @marwilliamson
LOL. It's a STATE ISSUE per 10A. So, yes, the state legislature, who people vote for, would have some say.