As long as they don’t hurt the art (which they’re not), I think environmental activists throwing food stuff etc. onto priceless paintings to highlight the insanity of our priorities is a pretty glorious piece of agitprop.

Oct 24, 2022 · 10:55 AM UTC

111
55
11
631
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
If these masterpieces are not protected within a laminate, they are protected by a layer of Damar varnish, or similar such material.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Or is it Dada 2.0? Duchamp approves.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Don’t hurt the art? jfc 🤦‍♂️ The managerial left is so concerned about their brunch being disrupted🍷
Replying to @marwilliamson
They’re paid
Replying to @marwilliamson
Them doing that has the exact opposite effect they want with me. The times I hear about this it makes me want to oppose what ever they are protesting. They are not shining a light on the environment they are turning middle of the road people into enemies.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Good.. they can go to your house next. It’s childish and counterproductive.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Peter Kalmus
 @ClimateHuman
23 Oct 2022
You are about to die because the room is overheating. You've tried everything to get them to turn down the heat but for whatever reason the people monitoring the cameras aren't doing anything. You have a can of soup and there's a famous painting protected by glass
Replying to @marwilliamson
You are horrible wrong!
Replying to @marwilliamson
It just doesn't make sense, remember when environmentalists were actually badass and doing stuff that mattered rather than trying to get likes online (which hurts the enviroment due to data processing)
Replying to @marwilliamson
Give the some crystals and sing Kumabaya. That'll probably fix it.
Load more