As long as they don’t hurt the art (which they’re not), I think environmental activists throwing food stuff etc. onto priceless paintings to highlight the insanity of our priorities is a pretty glorious piece of agitprop.

Oct 24, 2022 · 10:55 AM UTC

111
55
11
631
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
I had to look up the definition of agitprop. Now I know
Replying to @marwilliamson
There are much better ways. What kind of conservation is throwing paint and potatoes on old art, while creating more polarization?
2
5
Replying to @marwilliamson
actually, it is the dumbest sht ever.
Replying to @marwilliamson
How about the historic statues torn down? You good with those? Cause I'm NOT! Criminal acts should NOT be accepted by any of us.
Replying to @marwilliamson
value is a matter of perception and art dealer pumping
Replying to @marwilliamson
Wrong. Now we need metal.protectors in musea?
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
As long as nothing is damaged ... then I guess it's fair game!
Replying to @marwilliamson
It's BS. Sorry.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Nope. It hardens hearts. The only thing that will make change is to put people that will make the change you want in power.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I remember throwing paint on folks wearing new fur in Union Square, SF Can we get a CA reality check? So many corrupt democrats, Republicans would be worse. GO PROGRESSIVES
Load more