As long as they don’t hurt the art (which they’re not), I think environmental activists throwing food stuff etc. onto priceless paintings to highlight the insanity of our priorities is a pretty glorious piece of agitprop.

Oct 24, 2022 · 10:55 AM UTC

111
55
11
631
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
Woman attacked on D.C. Metrobus speaks exclusively to FOX 5 youtube.com/EG7tMZonhGk via @YouTube
Replying to @marwilliamson
Oh, does chef boyardee include paint preservatives in its soup now? Or will $thousands be spent cleaning the food off these masterpieces? $thousands that should be personally paid by these immature, science illiterate, book burners.
Replying to @marwilliamson
They should do it to the paintings that hang in the lobbys of the office towers that house the energy companies
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
They've tried other tactics but so far they haven't been able to get the general population out of their apathy regarding the destruction of the planet.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Nah. Since it is purely symbolic tantrums like this highlight how out of touch these so-called activists are with everyone else. When the people telling me this is a problem begin acting like it is a problem, I’ll take notice. Until then…
1
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
No I don't think so because the shock value has already worn off. Agitprops generally never work.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Read @AlexEpstein’s Fossil Future before you go around promoting the destruction of modern civilization.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Grow up
Replying to @marwilliamson
yes it gets attention
Replying to @marwilliamson
I still think there are more effective ways of getting your point across. Like @GretaThunberg FfF. This just comes across as annoying. not all attention is good attention and creates the annoying environmentalalist trope kind of like annoying vegan trope that is not good at all.
Load more