As long as they don’t hurt the art (which they’re not), I think environmental activists throwing food stuff etc. onto priceless paintings to highlight the insanity of our priorities is a pretty glorious piece of agitprop.

Oct 24, 2022 · 10:55 AM UTC

111
55
11
631
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
Good luck with this take. It only promotes the desire to shun them and ignore them. There’s no pseudo intellectual connection to Dada or a righteous cause. It’s viscerally repugnant despite intentions. Nothing is sacred but the sacred.Knowing the difference is Dadaesque
Replying to @marwilliamson
wrong on every level. its just as insane. art whether its famous, valuable or something i painted in my room has precious meaning and significance. it's deeply hurtful and counter productive.
Replying to @marwilliamson
It’s ridiculous and does nothing to advance the cause.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Throwing soup at gas stations would get people's attention.
Replying to @marwilliamson
It won't matter so long as they aren't hurting the art.
Replying to @marwilliamson
You’d support them buying magic beans as glorious, you mental patient.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Throwing stuff and acting like a juveniles dilutes the argument and alienates people from their cause.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Do you support BDS?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
No Marianne, you treat other people’s things with respect. I thought you were emotionally smarter than this.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yet…We The People need a distinct/succinct/detailed The King Has No Cloths On from The Youth in regard to OUR War of Terror for Daily Commerce: by far the Greatest Carbon Footprint Defiling Earth/Atmosphere; as well as defiling human relations on race, health, wealth❤️🇺🇸🕯🌏🙏🏽
Load more