As long as they don’t hurt the art (which they’re not), I think environmental activists throwing food stuff etc. onto priceless paintings to highlight the insanity of our priorities is a pretty glorious piece of agitprop.

Oct 24, 2022 · 10:55 AM UTC

111
55
11
631
Replying to @marwilliamson
And it's almost as effective as the congresswoman camping on the Capitol steps.🤷 Or the sunshine folks protesting Nancy P. In other words, Ridiculous.
2
6
Congresswoman Bush camping on the Capitol steps got action from the White House that would otherwise not have occurred. It was not ridiculous. Same for the Sunrise folks. They sent an important message. You’re actually proving my point.
3
1
1
38
Replying to @marwilliamson
What do you think happens to canvas when you throw food in it? You think you can just rinse the food off of it? Come on you’re smarter than this
2
The mashed potatoes on the Monét only hit the glass. Every article has pointed out that these activists have not harmed the art. Non-violence demands that no harm be done.
1
5
Replying to @marwilliamson
No bad idea. Because you will get copycats that will destroy art without glass.
Replying to @marwilliamson
If the goal is to make everyone hate the movement sure
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yikes. Showing yourself to be the totally loon that at first I thought you were, then I thought you weren't, but now I think you are again!
Replying to @marwilliamson
How is their act a "Return to Love"? The discourse is closed to just the two parties, and whether you're Green or Libertarian, you're kept from the conversation.
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
If you think this, you are truly lost!
1