Mikhail Gorbachev was a visionary leader. The refusal of the U.S. to help Russia when the Soviet Union collapsed was typical of America's arrogance and lack of visionary foreign policy. If we had helped Gorbachev then, Russia's path would probably have not been toward a Putin.

Aug 30, 2022 · 11:09 PM UTC

352
107
84
869
Replying to @marwilliamson
Not true, dear.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Russia competence level "bourne identity" production team
Replying to @marwilliamson
We couldn't even keep a trump out of our own story... Don't you think it's arrogant to believe we could have changed Russia?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Look, Marianne, don't try to be smart. It's never a good look on you. Gorbachev resigned on 12/25/91. The collapse ended on 12/26/91. Boring Yeltsin became president. Putin didn't even join Yeltsin's administration until 1996. Go smoke some oats, woman.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yeah you should probably sit this out as you clearly don't have the first clue what you're talking about. The US was massively proactive with post-communist Europe, including Russia, in the 90s. As anyone who was there can tell you - or anyone who has, ya know, read a book.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yeltsin rebelled against the USSR - & standing on a tank in front of the Duma, declared Russia an independent nation. At that point the US should have introduced a Marshall Plan & along with the EU, helped a country that had never known democracy & a free market create them.
Replying to @marwilliamson
It was a mistake in the larger ethical human context. In terms of the interests of this political military Empire it was deliberate
Replying to @marwilliamson
US has never been good at nation building. Bringing democracy to other countries is something they are even much less interested in as they are bringing democracy to USA.