Well if you put a cap then the other people on the plan have to pay the difference or the drug companies start having supply issues and you won’t be able to get it.

Who’s paying for it?

It’s more likely a government that shouldn’t have been regulating it to begin with.

Government needs to follow protocol of rules when adding items to bills that should not contain those matters. It was a scam to put it into a BUDGET reconciliation bill.

A congress who writes one bill with a 1000 parts has failed to define the problem. It's a mishmash of crap that nobody understands but generates stupid finger-pointing. Give me 1,000 bills each with: * One goal * 1-2 pages * Easy to understand Let each stand on its own merit

Gov't shouldn't be capping prices in anything. They also shouldn't be regulating to such an extent that competition is squelched and monopolies form (which then feast on money-printer-go-BRRRRR Gov't-$ for services private citizens ought pay for themselves).

Only the republican side of government. Here’s the list of republican senators who voted to defeat the $35 cap.

You mean 0$