Then f—ing do it please?
The SCOTUS decision to severely limit @EPA’s ability to reduce pollution under the Clean Air Act will have devastating consequences unless Congress takes action. With science-affirming majorities in Congress, we have a window of opportunity to offset the damage that’s been done

Jul 13, 2022 · 4:49 PM UTC

27
79
6
608
Replying to @marwilliamson
I really hope you are running again and wish I paid more attn to you during the primaries. peace.
2
2
12
Replying to @marwilliamson
They’ll promise to do it just in time for reelection and then drag their feet once they’ve secured another term. Round and round we go. We have to repair the system if we want to get actual action on hot button issues.
4
1
28
Replying to @marwilliamson
The president cannot make law through the EPA. Congress has to legislate. Such as it is, such as it should be.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
How arrogant, to think man can influence climate on a ball of rock hurling through space. The arrogance of the democrat party is stifling.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Marianne please just say fucking
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yeah, eff the Democracy you desperately want to save, right?
Replying to @marwilliamson
SCOTUS decision in simplistic terms was the EPA does not write laws rather that is the job of Congress. Many current Democrat stronghold states are the ones that pollute the most or whose economy is based on fossil fuels. Good luck getting Manchin to support an EPA bill.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I'm so mad at these MF's.
Replying to @marwilliamson
If the opposite of a Science-Affirming Majority in Congress ... is ... an Anti-Science-Affirming Majority ... and if we have a Science-Affirming Majority ... then I agree ... let's get something f---ing DONE!
1