Didn't a few Supreme Court justices perjure themselves before Congress when they testified that they considered Roe v. Wade "settled law?"
140
365
39
2,713
No. This is a really stupid grasp.
7
11
Replying to @SadieMills19
Not at all.

Jun 24, 2022 · 5:06 PM UTC

2
20
Replying to @marwilliamson
But it is. 1) Affirming precedence isn’t perjury, precedent can be overturned. 2) These affirmations were made before Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization case & facts were presented. 3) RvW precedent couldn’t hold its own against Dobbs v Jackson.
4
2
They were asked how they saw it. They lied.
1
1
15
more replies
Replying to @marwilliamson @SadieMills19
1