Didn't a few Supreme Court justices perjure themselves before Congress when they testified that they considered Roe v. Wade "settled law?"

Jun 24, 2022 · 5:04 PM UTC

140
365
39
2,713
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
No, because at that time it *was* "settled law." They didn't lie. Senators switched off their brains and heard what they wanted to hear. Most are lawyers and should have realized the so-called "promises" were meaningless.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes ...they are felons!
Replying to @marwilliamson
They responded like lawyers. They never answered a question as if they were answering, ‘will you rule to overturn Roe?’ They’re bad people, but a perjury charge unfortunately won’t stick.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes. And now what? That's a lifetime confirmation. You believe they're going to be impeached. There's one other alternative to their removal.
1
1
7
Replying to @marwilliamson
R P Shah Memorial Trust for Kids & Global Health @Rpshahmemorial1
24 Jun 2022
If anyone really loves their mom,their wife, sister or their daughter - This is the time to let them know . Sit with them& tell them that you will support them when they March against Roe vs Wade being overturned, nothing that you do will ever come close #RakshaBandhan
Replying to @marwilliamson
You know they chose their words very carefully.
Replying to @marwilliamson
laws are for the poor
Replying to @marwilliamson
Isn't "The right to bear arms shall not be infringed" settled law?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yeah, sort of
Replying to @marwilliamson
Sounds like an impeachable offense to me 🤔🤔
Load more