Didn't a few Supreme Court justices perjure themselves before Congress when they testified that they considered Roe v. Wade "settled law?"

Jun 24, 2022 · 5:04 PM UTC

140
365
39
2,713
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
Not really. They said, “As a *judge*, I have to go with precedent…” that has nothing to do with how they’ll interpret the law as a justice.
2
11
Replying to @marwilliamson
And isn’t lying to Congress a felony
Replying to @marwilliamson
It was settled law. They unsettled it.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Sadly no. They did not pledge to maintain that belief (obviously they never believed it) in perpetuity…
Replying to @marwilliamson
Can you perjure yourself with an opinion?
Replying to @marwilliamson
It doesn’t matter. This is about raw power. Stop with this ethical nonsense. They do not care. They will impose theocracy by any means necessary.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Who's going to hold the highest court in the land to account? Scooby-Doo?
Replying to @marwilliamson
the thing that gets me is they must have known they were perjuring themselves by voting this way… did they think they could just get away with it? that being apart of the highest court of the land makes them above the law?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Exactly what I’ve been thinking
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Do you think that the law matters to them?
1
Load more