Didn't a few Supreme Court justices perjure themselves before Congress when they testified that they considered Roe v. Wade "settled law?"

Jun 24, 2022 · 5:04 PM UTC

140
365
39
2,713
Replying to @marwilliamson
No. This is a really stupid grasp.
7
11
Not at all.
2
20
more replies
Replying to @marwilliamson
No. It was at the time. It’s not anymore. Pretty simple
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
When have people in power ever been held accountable for their lies?
Replying to @marwilliamson
It was settled , until it wasn't...now! ✝️✝️🇺🇸🇺🇸😍❤️😍😍👍👍
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
This image comes to mind…
1
1
13
Replying to @marwilliamson
Quite a stretch. What makes you think you know law better than them?
3
7
Replying to @marwilliamson
It was settled law until.this case. (Was it planed, can't say.) They had to know it was a possibility. RBG did,while she supported abortion rights, she didn't believe Roe was decided correctly. Congress, however, has had 49 yrs to put laws in place, just in case. Big fail.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Eliot Tokar @DrETtibmed
24 Jun 2022
Replying to @BeschlossDC
It is very clear that perjuring before Congress is legal for rightwing SCOTUS nominees. There is no rule of law without law enforcement.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Felony
6
Load more