I don't understand protecting a fetus but refusing to protect a child.

Jun 24, 2022 路 2:24 PM UTC

134
690
51
4,711
Replying to @marwilliamson
Lol you must have 馃挬 in ur head to think like that
Replying to @marwilliamson
Its because you're incapable of understanding that fetuses are human beings or that there are millions more law abiding gun owners than criminals.
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Clearly you don't understand. It's not a binary, mutually exclusive choice -- WE CAN PROTECT BOTH!
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
But our wonderful Congress is addressing all that. Making sure our kids are properly locked-up in school during the day and addressing mental health so when you buy that AR-15 without an extensive background check or walk around with a concealed weapon you aren't crazy!
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Because it has nothing to do with protection but control...
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Or giving new mothers paid leave so those that are able can breastfeed! Might ease the baby formula shortage.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
It鈥檚 the republiCON way! Protecting children costs money. A supreme court ruling is FREE!
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
The right definitely thinks their ideas will protect children.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
I don't understand protecting an eagle's egg, but not protecting a human fetus.
6
20