Because that latest abortion ruling has nothing to do with protecting children. Rather it has to do with a man’s dominion over his wife’s body. Put simply you exist just shit out babies for your husband and be subordinate to him, regardless of how you feel.
Congress has failed in regard to abortion. RBG foretold this very event years ago. While she fully supported abortion, she thought the ruling in Roe was incorrect in its application and would eventually be overturned - congress should have already had something in place for this.
Since the abortion issue is not mentioned in the constitution, it should be up to the States. It's how our government was supposed to work. We can also amend the constitution if need be. Children can also be protected by actually protecting them.
I understand it. "Protecting" a fetus requires virtually no time, $, effort, or any other inconvenience from the "protectors," while protecting a child requires a great deal of it.
It's the time of the woman. Look around...you can see it and feel it in the air now. More women are getting into positions of power than ever before. It's your time, Marianne.
It's about control and subjugation. It has nothing to do with protectng anything! They allow citizens to be slaughtered but demand special protection for themselves. Democracy is hanging by a thread at this point.
