I don't understand protecting a fetus but refusing to protect a child.

Jun 24, 2022 · 2:24 PM UTC

134
690
51
4,716
Replying to @marwilliamson
The solution isn't to just kill the child. The solution is still to protect the child.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Protect children with guns
1
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
A million children in Iraq killed by sanctions: worth it. —Madeline Albright.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
I understand the duopoly wanting to insure there is only one issue discussed in the next election, an issue neither party actually cares about.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
“Protecting a fetus” doesn’t exist. The fetus doesn’t care. This is the narrative of toxic masculinity asserting its assumed right to the womb for religion-sanctioned procreation. They don’t care about the fetus; they care about control; they care about dominion.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Or having more compassion and empathy for a zygote than a woman whose life will be turned upside down due to a moment of passion, a mistake, unwanted sex, failed birth control . whatever the circumstance.
1
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
It seems to me that the system is broken. Why should we rely on a system that has this level of inconsistency and inequity? We need to get establish community that focuses on meeting peoples' needs through community and not policy.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes you do. Protecting a fetus costs women a lot and men nothing. Protecting a child costs men guns.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Don't you see that the system is entirely broken. You only have extremes, polarisation and demonisation. Ditch the two party system and the MSM, all else is in vain.
1