People will die because of this. And to be very clear, they’re not doing this to protect the 2nd Amendment. They’re doing it to protect the primacy of property rights. That’s why so many millions of $ were spent getting them onto the Court to begin with. bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-cana…
502
71
88
311
Replying to @Timcast
Disingenuous interpretation:)

Jun 23, 2022 · 4:31 PM UTC

51
1
2
22
It’s not even an ‘interpretation’, it’s literally what you said.
1
Disingenuous interpretation... on both sides :)
How'd you feel if women had to show proper cause their life would be ruined if they weren't able to get an abortion? & since receiving death threats wasn't "proper cause" for many for CCW, let's say it also doesn't matter if the mother is likely to die if she continues pregnancy
You mean your’s right? Do you have any speed besides “sensationalist?” Also—you’re spreading disinformation.
3
Disingenuous post by you. The only people who will die from this are those who had planned to do something illegal anyways
4
Your right, more criminals are about to learn they can't just make anyone a victim!
1
2
60 million innocent human beings have been terminated in the womb since roe v wade, care to comment on those deaths?
2
2